In American history almost every tragic event has had the use or involvement of firearms dating back to when the country was founded. We have found out stopping these tragedies from happening is almost impossible but some may think the solution could be removal of all guns in America or impose more restrictions. In recent events, the tragedy in Las Vegas could be pointed out as one recent example in American history where gun control restrictions may be needed. But from the tragedy taken place at Sandy Hook may propose a solution to gun restrictions in America. This could have been an example where if there were fewer restrictions on civilians being allowed to legally carry concealed handguns then someone could have prevented the tragedy that had taken place in Sandy Hook. Nobody knows if that had played apart in the shootings, but it does bring up a serious question involving overly enhanced restrictions on gun ownership. Gun control restrictions in effect right now are taking guns away from innocent civilians who own guns for the sole purpose to defend themselves and their families, taking away or limiting those rights is unconstitutional on the basis of the 2nd Amendment. Owning a gun in America has been a given right since the nation was founded and is still protected by the Second Amendment, with more restrictions in place our given right would be encroached upon. The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution reads, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Our forefathers created the second amendment specifically for those rights and also to protect themselves if the government ever becomes tyrannical and needs to be overthrown, as the case of the Revolutionary War. This is considered a natural right that all American citizens have access just like the right to free speech. With more restrictions upon the right to bear arms, there will soon be no use for what this country was founded upon if we keep imposing more limitations. Gun control restrictions will not prevent criminals from obtaining guns or breaking laws. Criminals are unlikely to follow any law or restriction related to accessing firearms. Playing out a situation where a law abiding citizen suddenly could become in danger because the criminal would only have access to a gun. According to ProCon.org of 62 mass shootings in the United States between 1982 and 2012, 49 of the shooters used legally obtained guns. Collectively, 143 guns were possessed by the killers with about 75% obtained legally. Even if there was more gun restrictions on top of background checks on the people who intend to purchase guns, you cannot predict what they will be using them for or if the person is may seem normal but is mentally unstable. Not to mention this was a time when gun ownership doubled in the twentieth century, but also the murder rate decreased during this timeframe. Furthermore, owning more guns is actually a good thing for citizens and families who cannot escape violence, providing them with a safer environment and peace of mind knowing they are prepared for potential violence.Gun control restrictions infringe upon the right to self defense and deny law-abiding people sense of safety. According to an interest group famously known as the National Rifle Association (NRA), guns are used for self-defense 2.5 million times a year. The police can only do so much to stop violence and crimes but they cannot be everywhere and protect everyone all of the time. Leading to the next piece of evidence, which was a survey showing support for why being able to carry a gun can produce a feeling of security in citizens. According to a Pew survey on ProCon.org found that 57% of people believe that owning a gun protects them from being victimized. Criminals will not follow the law unless they have a fear of retaliation from victims who might be carrying concealed weapons. Wayne LaPierre, Executive Vice President of the NRA, stated, “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun”. The vast majority of American citizens of own guns are responsible, law abiding, and purchase their firearm legally. But the small percentage of people who choose to illegally purchase their guns are criminals. The restrictions imposed will only have an impact on licensed gun dealers which has a major effect on just lawfully made gun purchases leaving the criminals to find new ways to obtain what they want, and denying the right to law abiding citizens.Opposing views have a different opinion on gun control believing if they are fewer guns in America then there will be fewer deaths. This logic can make sense to some because guns kill people and if we do not have as many of them it may decrease the death total around the country. Unfortunately for the opposition their logic is only half correct due to a law called “shall issue”. Concealed gun laws are only enforced in some states so far and are most applied to crimes involving multiple victims. John R. Lott, Jr., author of More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, stated, “States with the largest increases in gun ownership also have the largest drops in violent crimes”. The reason is because more citizens now have the legal right to carry guns on them, enhancing personal and public safety. For example if more lawfully abiding people are legally allowed to carry concealed firearms there will be a higher chance of protecting someone in need.