Katherine Fausnaught It is not uncommon for children have anxiety. Through this study, the quality of friendships that belong to children with social phobia, is compared to friendships formed between children without diagnosed social phobia (Baker, J. R., & Hudson, J. L. (2015).). The study allowed the children participating to be included with a self-selected best friend of their choosing. This study examined the friendship quality in children with anxiety disorders. The children were tested into two groups. These groups were either anxious children with diagnosed social phobia (SP), or anxious children without a diagnosis of social phobia. Within the group with SP, it was suspected that children with a diagnosis of SP would have lower friendship qualities overall compared to children with anxiety but without a diagnosis of social phobia (Baker, J. R., & Hudson, J. L. (2015).). Another piece of the study was that students with and without social phobia were judged by a group of peers while the examined student gave a speech. This was used to determine the apparently likability of the child with or without SP. This study therefore allows those interested in uncovering if a child is more or less likely to have an intimate, reliable, and wholesome friendship by determining if the child has social phobia. The hypothesis of the study is that clinically anxious children with a diagnosis of social phobia would be found to have lower friendship qualities than children without clinical anxiety. The evidence was not strong enough to prove that clinically anxious children without a social phobia diagnosis would be found to have lower overall friendship quality than those without a clinical diagnosis. (Baker, J. R., & Hudson, J. L. (2015).)This study included the involvement of 166 children between the ages of 7 and 13. 116 of the involved subjects had been diagnosed with anxiety disorders, and 50 children were found not to have anxiety disorders; it was this group of children that acted as a control group within the study (Baker, J. R., & Hudson, J. L. (2015).). The children were not distinctly defined in groups determined by gender. The children without clinical anxiety disorders were recruited through the use of advertisements posted at schools. The children of the study were asked to complete a Friendship Quality Questionnaire, which had the child analyse a friendship of their choice. The child was given a scale of 1 to 5, from “not at all true” to “really true”as answers. This was used to judge the friendship with 40 pre written questions as guidelines for determining the quality of friendship between the two children (Baker, J. R., & Hudson, J. L. (2015).). The children were also tested on the Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale in order to determine the exhibited symptoms of social phobia and anxieties. On this scale, the child self judged themselves and responded to symptoms with answers of “never”, “sometimes”, or “always” (Baker, J. R., & Hudson, J. L. (2015).). Finally, the children with social anxiety were asked to participate in interviews to diagnose disorders as it was done through the use of the DSM IV.The hypothesis was found to not be fully accurate in it’s predictions. It was incorrect in the part of the theory that those with social phobia did not report significantly lower quality of friendship than those without social phobia. A review of the study suggests that the discrepancy may be due to the friends that the children without diagnosed anxiety disorders had chosen. Nonclinical children reported higher friendship quality than those with social phobia and the anxious children without social phobia, however their friends had reported a lower quality of friendship and in turn reduced the rank of the nonclinical children’s overall quality of friendship. Based on the reports of the children, there was a trend for a large difference in group preference during the selection to determine friendship quality (Baker, J. R., & Hudson, J. L. (2015).). It is possible that children with clinical social phobia selected friends who were more likely to like them, in comparison to the children without social phobia who were less so inclined to earn positive regards from their chosen friends. The hypothesis seems to be accurate however, with the findings that those with social phobia reported lower quality of friendship than anxious children without social phobia. This is a challenge to determine due to the lack of concrete differences in friendship quality between SP and non-clinical children. The study at leasts brings up the idea that children diagnosed with SP could be separated from children with other anxiety disorders.The study is useful due to its ability to determine possible causes of less than fulfilling friendships between children with anxieties and those without. These can be taken into consideration in social settings for children, such as schools and other public outings. Because it is possible for discrepancies, the study could have been affected if the children diagnosed with social phobia, or those without, were not fully honest in relaying truthful information during the analysis stage of the friendship quality questionnaire or interviews. The study seemed to be a good place to begin in terms of opening the research field to look deeper into the quality of friendships between children of different social strengths. The study could have been improved however had it been able to include more children to gain a larger overall perspective of the children with various stages of social anxiety. The article has done well to gain thought in connection to the subject. It is an interesting matter to delve into in terms of both theoretical and active application. The viewing and comparison of children with social phobias versus those without is an important aspect of children’s socialization that should be further studied. Several questions that should also be posed include: “Could the environment influence a child to be more or less inclined to have a social phobia?” or “What can be done to decrease the effect that social phobia has on a child whose quality of friendship is being limited?” These questions seem to be in close enough connection that, when paired with a larger scale study, they could help to uncover some uncertainty regarding the study or to find ways to limit the number of children affected by anxieties and social phobia.