Aveneu Park, Starling, Australia

There to prove to people that the

There have been some benefits
from the Common Core standards. The first one is that the Common Core standards
do indeed have content and skills that are important for school. According to
the Common Core website, “The English language arts standards require certain
critical content for all students, including classic myths and stories from
around the world, America’s founding documents, foundational American
literature, and Shakespeare… The mathematics standards lay a solid foundation
in whole numbers, addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, fractions,
and decimals” (Myths). The Common Core website wants to show that the standards
have some meaning behind it and wants to make it good in the midst this
conflicting issue. It wants to show that the Common Core standards are a good
thing for the country and nothing that speaks of torturing the students.

            Also, the Common Core has standards that are based on
previous research. Also, according to the Common Core website, “The evidence
base includes scholarly research, surveys on what skills are required of
students entering college and workforce training programs, assessment data
identifying college? and career?ready performance, and comparisons to standards
from high?performing states and nations” (Myths). The website wants to prove to
people that the misconceptions of the Common Core are false and do not reflect
what the Common Core’s goals are.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

            The Common Core state standards would prove to be cost-efficient
in the testing development for students. This can prove beneficial for the
finance of each school district in the country. Even though, according to an
article on Teachhub.com would also contradict, “This may not directly benefit
students, but it’s a victory when a wise educational move doubles as an
economic plus for states” (Pros). The students right now can care less about
the money and more about their education, but this is a huge victory for the
financial side of school districts. They can have money now to bring back
classes that might have disappeared in the last few years or they can even
create events on the money that was saved.

            Another good thing about the Common Core is that the
standards are actually a state-led effort and not led by the federal
government. According to the Common Core website, “State adoption of the
standards is in no way mandatory. States began the work to create clear,
consistent standards before the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which
provided funding for the Race to the Top grant program.” (Myths) In the end,
the states will be the final decision on whether or not to adopt the Common
Core standards. The states can either adopt it or they can keep their original
standards. This gives the states a great amount of power considering that the
federal government cannot control education according to the Constitution.

            The final benefit of the Common Core is that it allows
all fifty states to compare each other’s academic standards. Before the Common
Core State Standards, states across the country would check how well each kid
is doing by their standards, but the standards were very different in terms of
what a child needs to know by a certain grade level. Matter in fact, according
to Jordan Catapano, “it was anyone’s guess how states ranked against one
another.” (TeachHub) When the Common Core was adopted, these standards set a
common ground to compare and see which states are ahead of the pack and which
ones have to play catch up with everybody.

Cons
Against the Common Core

            Over the years since the Common Core was introduced,
there have been a lot of major flaws in the system. The most common one is that
some of the most gifted adults to be teachers look for other jobs. According to
web author Derrick Meador, “Many veteran teachers have retired rather than
adjust the way they teach. The stress of getting their students to perform will
likely continue to cause more teacher and administrator burnout.” (Meador) The
transition from separate state standards to the new Common Core State Standards
can be hard transition considering that the teachers aren’t used to some of the
concepts that the Common Core wants students to excel in. This can make
teachers lose their calling and find another job that is another best fit for
them. If and when this happens, it will cause another problem in the schools in
the form of a teacher shortage which can prove to be really devastating.

            Another problem to the Common Core Standards is that the
standards do not accommodate students who have special needs, specifically
children with autism, ADHD, and numerous learning disabilities. As Meador also
argues, one example of the discrimination of special ed students is “There is
no modified test for the Common Core Standards, meaning that 100% of a school’s
population has their results reported for accountability purposes.” (Meador)
The quote proves that the standards have a lack of knowledge of what a student
with a mental disability needs in order to just to think normally for the assessment
that the Common Core requires. If a country that is all about democracy is not
providing the very same fairness they say on an assessment test, then the U.S.

might have just discriminated against special ed students and make them feel
unwelcomed.

            The third problem with the Common Core is that there are
only English and Math standards and that other subjects such as science, social
studies, and foreign languages do not have any standards at all. As Derrick
Meador explains that “This leaves it up to individual states to have to develop
their own set of standards and assessments for these topics.” (Meador) It is
totally contradicting what the goal of the Common Core is. The goal is to have
all fifty states follow one unified curriculum. If there is going to be one
unified curriculum, there has to be standards in other subjects that are also
not English or Math. Otherwise, there should not be the Common Core Standards.

            Also, the language of the Common Core standards are way
too technical and use too many words that people don’t know about. According to
Valerie Straus, she argues that “the framers of Common Core used so many
unnecessary clauses and packed it full of so much argot that certain standards
become unintelligible at first sight. Why not write standards so that
parents and students can understand them?” (Strauss) If someone is going to
write something that would become a law, that person should use language that
people will understand, not scholarly words that only the most educated can
use. The language of the standards will make adults, especially teachers, feel
very confused about how to interpret them. What the Common Core says about one
thing could be interpreted as another thing for the parents.

x

Hi!
I'm Simon!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out